Part 2
« Back to Search Engine Optimisation page 1Keywords and key phrases.
It is vital to understand that people using search engines usually do not search for what you imagine is the best 'selling' text for your site.
Let's imagine you sell Biff Aftershave, and state in a big headline on your site:
"You not only want to look your best for that special date, you want to smell right too.
Something classy that says more than words alone can say - "
Imagine all the
words and phrases from the headline above have been indexed by a search
engine. What will someone searching for 'aftershave' or 'Biff brand' or 'male
toiletries'
find? The answer is, from that headline, NOTHING!
But put this in a search engine:
"Something
classy that says more than words alone can say" and our site would most
likely come out number 1!
The problem is only the site owner who wrote it would dream of
searching with such a phrase.
Writing copy for websites is very different from writing copy for press advertisements. Let's try again. We need to pin down those keywords.
How do you search for competitors' websites? What words do enter in the search box? These could be the very keywords you should be using on your site. Note down the keywords that brought you successfully to their site. How did those keywords get on their site? By good luck or good SEO advice? Either way, your competitors had those keywords on their site.
Your site's logs (statistics) will show what kind of words and phrases are being searched for by site visitors who arrive via search engines. If your traffic is low, these might not be representative. And for a new site there will not be any. So here are some external tools:
You can see associated keywords here:
www.kwmap.com [opens in
new browser window]
Entering in 'aftershave' at the above site gives us a list of about 35 associated
keywords in alphabetical order, from 'aftershave balm' to 'trishave'.
Admittedly many of these are useless, but it does give us some more useful
keywords to play with
Now we can find how many people search for particular keywords and some alternatives
with figures here:
http://inventory.overture.com/d/searchinventory/suggestion/ [opens
in new browser window]
Searches/month over 100 |
Search
Term
|
1991
486 286 204 177 174 135 121 116 115 115 101 100 |
aftershave man aftershave aftershave lotion aftershave online cheap aftershave bay rum aftershave aftershave lagerfeld aftershave uk aftershave saxon discount aftershave polo aftershave hugo boss aftershave perfume aftershave |
'Aftershave' has nearly 5 times more searches than the next keyword 'man aftershave'. It may not be prefect English, but these are real searches by real potential customers. If we want to use 'man aftershave' we would need to work this into a sentence like, "Gifts for every man aftershave and skin care" for example.
Another question: is it 'aftershave' or 'after shave' and does Google differentiate
between them?
Another useful site will quickly tell the difference: www.googlebattle.com
[opens in new browser window]. The day we checked 'after shave' had 2.5 times
more searches than 'aftershave'. So we don't dump 'aftershave' we use them
both, but major with the two-word version.
To see if Google treats the one or two word variants differently, simply search
Google for them and compare results. It does not differentiate between 'web
site' and 'website', for example.
Then our careful search for keywords would continue. In principle it is better to use more higher-searched keywords and phrases. However, the competition for these keywords will be higher too. Thus a further criteria comes into play, that of 'keyword effectiveness'. We supply our SEO clients with not only the most popular search words for their site text, but also rate the effectiveness of these words to put together a site that will pull ahead of the competition.
Back to our aftershave: time for a re-write aiming at including our keywords - majoring on the most searched ones - getting them in first as our headline:
After shave, shave, preshave, shower, skin care products for men
- all available online at great savings
But isn't "great savings" reverting to our press advertising copy style again? You may think they are great, but would a potential purchaser ask for "great savings"? Wouldn't they be more likely ask for "big savings" or "online savings" or "discount" ? Well, according to the Overture site above the daily searches are:
great savings - 72
big savings - 184
online savings - 337
discount - 113,710
So we would change the headline to include 'discount'.
Google thinks that
if you found a phrase important enough to be a headline,
it must rate higher in its ranking. You can also see how useless "Welcome
to my site" is!
The same applies to words in sub headers and in bold.
You can see how your site (or any other) rates in Google for selected keywords
here:
www.googlerankings.com/index.php [opens
in new browser window]
You can see how densely you keywords and phrases appear on specific site pages
here:
www.ranks.nl/cgi-bin/ranksnl/spider/spider.cgi?lang [opens
in new browser window]
Many consider their home page is the most important page to optimise for search engines, but all pages are important and search engines will list many if not all your site pages and visitors will enter your site at these 'back doors'. So try to think of your site as a number of pages, rather than a complete website. Concentrate on different keywords on different pages - keywords & phrases 1, 2 & 3 on page 1. We actually call file name keyword1.htm – where 1 is the most important keywords of 1, 2 & 3. Then the same with 4, 5 & 6 on page 2 and so on.
Warning!
There is a limit to the number of times keywords and phrases can be repeated
before the search engine realises it is being 'spammed' and could well drop
the site from its listings because of this. If you aim for a maximum of 7%
of your words to be keywords, you won't run into trouble. This is going to
be 3 to 4 times on an 'average' page.
(iii) Inbound Links (also known as 'back links')
Google loves links. It bases much of its rating on links coming into sites. How many links do you have coming in? The logic is that if your site is worth visiting, then another site owner will want to refer visitors to your site for useful and complimentary information (like the links in the text on this page). It's another way of measuring a site's value. You can easily check this at Google by entering the following in the search window:link:www.yourdomain.com (Note: search engines only show a % of the total links to a domain.)
There is also more to links than just linking to other complimentary
sites:
the effectiveness of links depends where the wording
(or anchor) of the link. "Click Here" is not as highly
rated as say, "Diet
Information" (for a diet site, of course).
Also where the comes from plays a part:
an important factor in Google's overall
rating of sites is their inbound links (or backlinks). This is rated between
0 and 10, and is called PageRank (PR)
(Yahoo has a similar system called Web Rank). If your links come
from a site with a higher PR, your PR will similarly rise. So it's quality
as well as quantity. PageRank is a registered trademark of the Google Corporation.
See details at Google [links
to Google section concerned - opens in new browser window]
You can check any
site's PR here.
4) General:
Cheaters will be punished
You can try and cheat search engines in numerous ways. There are many businesses
out on the web offering services that use these methods and charge handsomely
for their service.
Inserting small text (a long list of keywords) that
is the same colour as
the page
background to get SEs to index it, but it remains invisible to human site
visitors.
'Link
clubs' or 'link farms' are another way. Obtaining valuable backlinks by
buying them.
'Gateway' pages and 'cloaking' that have pages of keywords that are to be viewed only by search engines. But check what Google has to say about such ideas. There are many more such cheats and doubtless more to be invented - they may work for a limited time, but could very well result in the site concerned being banned or dropped well down in the lists.
Not all traffic is good traffic
For a few dollars you can buy 1000s of visitors. But unless these are targeted
visits, interested in your site contents, all you will do is give
away your bandwidth/ data transfer and slow down your site. The beauty of
traffic from search engines is that the visitors want to come to your site.
Don't let it get you down
What Google is doing is trying to get the best and most relevant sites
to the top for each search. A few site actually get to the top
of their market simply by doing it right without going out of their way to
select keywords and develop reciprocal links etc. But those sites are few
and it is more prudent to employ a SEO expert than trust your site's progress
to luck.
eCommerce - nobody will buy rubbish
The internet is NOT a magic place where the normal laws of physics
and commerce are suspended. The fact is, if you have products or services that
no-one wants in the real word - they will receive the same reception in cyber
land. Over-priced, uncompetitive items will not sell - end of story.
In fact, it is generally assumed there is an advantage in buying online as
opposed to the High Street or shopping mall. These advantages include lower
prices,
faster delivery and exclusivity (ie. not available elsewhere). So, getting
your website high in search engine rankings is only part of the story.
No-one can guarantee number 1 ranking - though many claim
to
Who says so? Google again.
5) Finally, the punch line
If you already have a site, but you feel it is under performing, or are starting from scratch, you really should set some budget aside for search engine optimisation. The website is the vehicle, but SEO is the fuel that will make it fly.
We are more than happy to quote you for various levels of optimization - from a straightforward report of an existing site, through to implementing a complete site optimisation. Please note: we do not employ any 'black hat' methods as alluded to above in our optimisation recommendations.



© Copyright Paul Bilton 1998